Maggie & Murdoch

According to papers released by the Margaret Thatcher Archive Trust, Maggie and Murdoch met for a lunch at Chequers on the 4th January 1981. This was just before Murdoch was confirmed as the new owner of the Times and Sunday Times Newspapers. During this meeting he expressed interest in making the Times a profitable operation with the use of new technology.

When Murdoch made a bid for The Times he already owned The Sun and News of the World, meaning with The Times he would be on his way to Monopolising the Press and bring his one step closer to becoming the media mogul he is today. There was a commission in place, to prevent one organisation having too much control over the media, however the file suggests this was not even a consideration during the meeting. The Fair Trading Act of 1973 calls for each significant newspaper take over to be submitted to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission unless the State Secretary agreed the newspaper was at risk of closing down and was unprofitable. During this time, The Times had suffered several losses, meaning the takeover could go ahead without a referral from the MMC.

The deal made quickly because ministers feared that the newspaper would closed if a sale was not made quickly. This set a precedent because people now know how they are able to go ahead with media takeovers without approval of the MMC.

Andy McSmith said on the matter:  “No British politician did more than Mrs Thatcher to help the rich get richer, and yet all along she privately believes that money does not make anyone happy – except Rupert Murdoch, presumably.”

Over the last thirty years Rupert Murdoch has gone onto add plenty more companies to his  media portfolio, including 20th Century Fox, The Wall Street Journal, LA Dodgers, Harper Collins, Dow Jones, IGN and BskyB.

Do you believe that the present media ownership laws properly safeguard the interest of the general public? I don’t understand how we can have fair, unbiased articles and stories brought to us all under one man’s influence. If the media is monopolised in such a way it means the general public are all subjected to only one opinion and although it may seem a bit extreme to label it as Brainwashing, in some ways that is exactly what it is.  Murdoch’s empire covers so many bases, his organisation’s influence is coming at us from so many different angles, it would be in the interests of the general public to some how restrict his influence. Politicians should not be allowed to hold confidential meetings with publishers! I believe that rather than waiting 30 years to uncover all the sly things our prime ministers get up to we should know about them in real time. 

BBC News – Archived Papers reveal Thatcher Secrets

Will we ever be able to contain Murdoch’s power? What can be done to tighten up Media Ownership Laws? 


4 thoughts on “Maggie & Murdoch

  1. We will never be able to contain murdoch’s power. After the Hacking scandle last year murdoch may have lost a business in the news of the world but his business empire is as strong as ever. Also after last weeks budget announcements including the cut in the 50p tax to 45P… other rich men will just keep getting richer the goverment were under now is just providing the perfect breeding ground for theese empires and i wouldn’t be surprised if the goverment get a sneaky under the table return for it either.

    Futhermore, the goverment cannot simply take away his empire so the deals and meetings will just keep going on because they have no other option.

    Another point to add alot of news is now posted on twitter first before anything. some of it lies some of it true this is before it is even posted in the news.. the big question should be how can this be controled or does it?. personally i dont buy papers anymore i just read on the internet.

  2. The best example of Murdoch’s power, in my opinion, would be the influence he has had over various elections.

    As for the internet being a source of news, Newspapers are becoming somewhat obsolete where as the Internet is becoming absolute. I don’t believe there is anyway to control or regulate the internet, it is a forum of free speech and I think introducing regulations on twitter and other social media sites wouldn’t benefit the online community. The internet allows people to share their points of view and take them into consideration before coming to their own conclusion. Saying that however, I still read newspapers because I think some of the things written on the internet aren’t articulated properly, where as the papers are. I have quite strong views on the matter of internet regulation, I could ramble on alot more about it but you’re safe for now.

    1. i completely agree.. so is it possible that murdoch media empire is now becoming a secondary source of news to the internet? in that case hopefully there is no need to try and cap it?

  3. Although it the papers may becoming a secondary source of news, I think on principal it would be best to try to contain Murdoch’s influence. So people understand that monopolising the media is wrong, whether that be broadcast news, papers or news from social medias.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s